<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging: a fad that’s peaked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephennewton.com/blogging-fad-thats-peaked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephennewton.com/blogging-fad-thats-peaked/</link>
	<description>...stuff I&#039;ve seen, stuff I&#039;ve heard and stuff I&#039;ve read</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:31:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.stephennewton.com/blogging-fad-thats-peaked/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2004 11:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephennewton.com/blogging-fad-thats-peaked.html#comment-180</guid>
		<description>On that last point, I have an example. I posted much of the above as a comment on James?s site, which he deleted. That?s okay, it?s his blog. But it does make me wonder by what principles James manages the content generated by visitors to his blog. It appears that dissenters are deleted, rather than engaged in debate and I don?t feel that principle will survive the trends James describes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On that last point, I have an example. I posted much of the above as a comment on James?s site, which he deleted. That?s okay, it?s his blog. But it does make me wonder by what principles James manages the content generated by visitors to his blog. It appears that dissenters are deleted, rather than engaged in debate and I don?t feel that principle will survive the trends James describes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.stephennewton.com/blogging-fad-thats-peaked/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2004 11:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephennewton.com/blogging-fad-thats-peaked.html#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Writing for the FT?s an impressive achievement, but my criticism stands. James has listed ten trends, not ten principles.

Consumer control, scepticism and resistance to advertising are trends to be responded to, not principles (how new they are is debatable) [1,2]. Media fragmentation, niche Vs mass marketing ditto [3,4]. I don?t know if James refers to corporate governance or pressure to perform [5]. A call to respond to change is not a principle [6]. Behaviour is changing; yes, and?? [7]. Broadcast model broken, is repetition of trends three and four [8]. If broadband is a mass medium, as James suggests, it?s bucking the fragmentation trend and emulating the broken broadcast model. Isn?t it an enabler of media fragmentation? [9] On ?Consumer generated content?, James?s optimism requires justification (&lt;a href=http://www.stephennewton.com/blogging-fad-thats-peaked.html&gt;see here&lt;/a&gt;) [10].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Writing for the FT?s an impressive achievement, but my criticism stands. James has listed ten trends, not ten principles.</p>
<p>Consumer control, scepticism and resistance to advertising are trends to be responded to, not principles (how new they are is debatable) [1,2]. Media fragmentation, niche Vs mass marketing ditto [3,4]. I don?t know if James refers to corporate governance or pressure to perform [5]. A call to respond to change is not a principle [6]. Behaviour is changing; yes, and?? [7]. Broadcast model broken, is repetition of trends three and four [8]. If broadband is a mass medium, as James suggests, it?s bucking the fragmentation trend and emulating the broken broadcast model. Isn?t it an enabler of media fragmentation? [9] On ?Consumer generated content?, James?s optimism requires justification (<a href=http://www.stephennewton.com/blogging-fad-thats-peaked.html>see here</a>) [10].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.stephennewton.com/blogging-fad-thats-peaked/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 18:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephennewton.com/blogging-fad-thats-peaked.html#comment-179</guid>
		<description>Are you joking James Cherkoff is the bang on!  And the Financial Times doesn&#039;t seem to think he&#039;s a naive marketing consultant.  He&#039;s their guest columnist this week. See http://www.collaboratemarketing.com/modernmarketing/2004/11/strongready_for.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you joking James Cherkoff is the bang on!  And the Financial Times doesn&#8217;t seem to think he&#8217;s a naive marketing consultant.  He&#8217;s their guest columnist this week. See <a href="http://www.collaboratemarketing.com/modernmarketing/2004/11/strongready_for.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.collaboratemarketing.com/modernmarketing/2004/11/strongready_for.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.stephennewton.com/blogging-fad-thats-peaked/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephennewton.com/blogging-fad-thats-peaked.html#comment-178</guid>
		<description>A fair cop, text corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fair cop, text corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Singleton</title>
		<link>http://www.stephennewton.com/blogging-fad-thats-peaked/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Singleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephennewton.com/blogging-fad-thats-peaked.html#comment-177</guid>
		<description>&quot;Over at the Adam Smith Institute they?re propagating the blogs will revolutionise democracy myth.&quot;

We are???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Over at the Adam Smith Institute they?re propagating the blogs will revolutionise democracy myth.&#8221;</p>
<p>We are???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
