Fox resignation leaves too many questions unanswered

Stephen Newton introduces Newsnight viewers to the Atlantic BridgeLiam Fox has resigned, but many questions remain and he we have yet to see if he has acted quickly enough to save cabinet colleagues from further embarrassing questions.

I suggested that Cameron would resign Fox on Monday, to save William Hague and have been proved wrong. Cameron has a tendency to be indecisive in these matters – remember how he held on to Andy Coulson – and has done his best to insist on a fortnight’s civil service investigation. He failed to understand that he was effectively commissioning a fortnight’s journalistic investigation too.

But even with Fox gone, too many questions remain unanswered. Today, Geraldine Peacock, who was chair of the Charity Commission from 2002 to 2006, backed this blogger’s call for the commission to re-open its investigation of the Atlantic Bridge, and more specifically to consider whether misspent charity money should be repaid. Peacock would also like the commission to look at the level of benefit received by Liam Fox, who was a trustee. I would like that investigation to also ask whether others involved in running the charity – including advisory board members George Osborne, William Hague, Michael Gove, Chris Grayling, Eleanor Laing and John Whittingdale – benefited in anyway.

The Atlantic Bridge’s UK charity was required to cease all its activities in July 2010 as none served any charitable purpose. It was given until September 2011 to clean-up its act, but instead opted to wind-up. Its assets were demised to another charity that neither the commission nor the Atlantic Bridge itself will reveal. Last night Newsnight revealed that senior Atlantic Bridge personnel have established a new organisation, Transatlantic Bridge, and have confirmed that the Atlantic Bridge will live on despite the winding up of its UK charity; it has always consisted of multiple legal entities and the US charity continues to trade despite questions from the IRS.

The Fox saga continued for so long, and was so overwhelming, in large part because it was at least three scandals rolled into one. The Guardian’s interest was peaked when by a disgruntled Harvey Boulter, chief executive of Porton Capital, which worked with the MoD to develop innovative technology in the battle against MRSA. A deal with US conglomerate 3M had gone sour and Boulter might have lost his shirt. He wanted government backing to take on 3M in the courts and claimed that Liam Fox was involved in placing a question mark over a knighthood for 3M’s CEO. This was scandal number one; it was complex and could have fallen either way. But it when Boulter found himself negotiating with Adam Werritty it led directly to scandal number two; Werritty turned out to be an off-the-books advisor to Fox, who had had bypassed protocol, security screening and was funded by a small group of Tory party donors and a private intelligence group. If scandal number one wasn’t enough to bring down Fox, scandal number two certainly looked the business.

Remarkably the best Fox’s friends could do in his defence was claim that he’d been taken by a Walter Mitty character. This was nonsense, which even if true would place a serious question mark over any minister who had been shown to be so gullible. And Fox had at least one other off-the-books advisor; Lieutenant-Colonel Graham Livesey.

As the media has dug deeper, so it has discovered that Werritty was in the pay by the Atlantic Bridge, that was wound-up just last month. This brings us the scandal number three, which is only just getting traction in the media. Those of us who have been blogging this story since 2009 have always been told it was too complex to go big. But now, thanks to Cameron’s dithering, investigative journalists from every major UK news outlet are working to get their heads around it. Not only is this third blow likely to take Fox down, if Cameron continues to dither it may well spread to his cabinet colleagues and beyond. The question post-resignation is whether Fox’s departure is enough to kill off interest in his, and others, wrongdoing.
Posts on the Atlantic Bridge are collected here.

5 thoughts on “Fox resignation leaves too many questions unanswered

  1. I suspect Gus O”Donnell knew right away Liam Fox was off, they just been trying to manage it carefully to minimize the damage to reputations. But it looks like this stoy really has legs. Only now after a week do we hear mention of the Israel Neocon connections. Do they really believe Liam Fox falling on his dagger is going to draw a line under this matter? I doubt it…

  2. Ian I totally agree that Liam Fox is only one.
    There are more and if more digging is done they will be found.
    They are running scared a can of worms is about to be opened

  3. Pingback: Another BDS Success : John Michael McDonagh Cancels His Attendance at the Haifa International Film Festival « KADAITCHA

  4. Just discovered your diary courtesy of the Guardian (not a paper I think highly of, but one must read something) Good on you for uncovering about Atlantic Bridge, but I think wouldn’t trust the Charity Commission to investigate anything unless embarrassed into doing so by someone as high profile as yourself. Before I became homeless I worked briefly for Amnesty International, and it therefore fascinated me to read about director Irene Khan and her deputy Kate Gilmore walking off with a payoff of £800,000 (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1358537/Revealed-Amnesty-Internationals-800-000-pay-offs-bosses.html) – and like an awful lot of things, you won’t read about it in the Guardian. They had to resign from the Charity Commission after being exposed.

    Being homeless you see and hear of corruption large and small in homeless charities every day – what we call the homeless industry is an £800m racket – none of it would be possible if the charity commission did its job. And you sure won’t read about it in the Guardian – why, they’d lose half their readers! But seriously, does anyone know if the Charity Commission has ever caused anyone to be prosecuted over irregulaties – I very much doubt it.

Leave a Reply